Farmer Opens Up About The Impact Of Inflation On Crops

expand_more

1 views2 years ago

thumb_upLike

thumb_downDislike

library_addSave

flagReport

NewsVids check_circle

0 subscribers

Posted • August 29, 2024: Corn and soybean farmer Ron Wiegand discusses how President Biden's economic policies affect farm incomes on 'America Reports.'

vid:232316

Comments0

unfold_more

00:51

Flashback - Dr. Janette Nesheiwat: Masks In Schools And 'The Science'

more_vert

NewsVids check_circle

1 views 1 year ago

Posted • November 24, 2024: In the grand scheme of things, "Surgeon General" is a wasteful and often counterproductive (assuming the goal is actually improving public health and not advancing special interests) position that Trump should do away with entirely. No one needs a sleazy bureaucrat in a silly admiral costume using their tax money to tell them how to live their lives — much less issuing pseudoscientific edicts for unclear and nefarious purposes, as we have been subject to for many years now. What we need, in my opinion and apparently many other Americans’ given the recent election results, is a bulldog like RFK Jr., doctor or not, to clean up the water, air, drug, and food supplies through — and I know this is anathema to conservative orthodoxy, but I believe it’s necessary in the real world with bad industry actors who don’t care about human health and often, indeed, seem hellbent on ruining it — regulations that make sense and that are applied honestly and aggressively.

But anyway, if this government bloat is to continue in perpetuity, the Surgeon General ought rightly to be someone exactly not like Janette Nesheiwat, Trump’s nominee. Nesheiwat, who specialized in emergency and family medicine, has supported vaccines that Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Trump’s nominee for HHS secretary, has cast doubts about. Janette has not just “supported vaccines”; she has actively promoted and praised censorship of dissident voices on the topic in the alleged service of Public Health™. She called the COVID “vaccines” — which are not now and never were real vaccines and which killed and maimed more people than we can perhaps ever fully account for — a “gift from God.” https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GdB_7k9WYAA4Toj?format=jpg&name=large

She also fearmongered in 2021 on nominally conservative Fox News with no pushback from the “journalist” interviewing her about COVID “putting our children in the hospital in record numbers” and, as a result, hospitals were “running out of ICU beds.” Both claims were lies. None of this garbage is what American voters signed off on when they elected Trump. (…)

• More at: PJ Media - Trump Really Screwed the Pooch With His Surgeon General Nomination
https://pjmedia.com/benbartee/2024/11/24/trump-really-screwed-the-pooch-with-his-surgeon-general-nomination-n4934584
Politico: Trump chooses Fox News contributor Dr. Janette Nesheiwat for surgeon general
https://www.politico.com/news/2024/11/22/trump-chooses-fox-news-contributor-dr-janette-nesheiwat-for-surgeon-general-00191379

01:23

Trump's Surgeon General Nominee Praised Facebook For Its Censorship During Covid

more_vert

NewsVids check_circle

1 views 1 year ago

Posted • November 23, 2024: President-elect Donald Trump's cabinet picks have been mostly great so far, but Trump has a history of making bad choices. One of those bad choices, according to conservatives, is Trump's nominee for Surgeon General. No, it's not Ben Carson … it's Dr. Janette Nesheiwat, whose resume during the COVID-19 lockdowns isn't stellar. Why? Here's Nesheiwat on Fox Business praising Facebook's approach to censoring anti-vaccine "disinformation" and hoping that other social media platforms would follow suit. Trump's pick for Surgeon General, Janette Nesheiwat, praised Facebook for censoring anti-vaccine information, adding that she will "hope and pray" other social media companies do the same. -- Nesheiwat was also a BIG fan of masking and social distancing. Janette Nesheiwat endorsed masks for children, promoted COVID vaccination for all age groups, and approved of censorship by social media companies.

Look, there's a lot we didn't know about COVID. But we know it now, so why regress? This is like when former Planned Parenthood President Dr. Leana Wen told CNN in December of 2021 that "cloth masks a little more than facial decoration" and don't work — after we'd all been forced to wear cloth masks. Or when President Joe Biden promised you wouldn't contract or spread COVID if you got the vaccine. Then Biden got COVID at least twice despite double-masking and getting every booster available. But no, we don't want anyone who praised social media for censoring discussion of the vaccine and its effectiveness. Let's hope she has revised her stance on these things in light of all the new information that has come out since the time of this interview. She allegedly has … but to praise Facebook's censorship efforts? That's hard to forgive. […]

A lot of people in the replies favor Florida’s Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo, who was handpicked by Gov. Ron DeSantis, the country's best governor. So Nesheiwat was a clueless as everyone else during the pandemic, but word is that she's changed? But why her when there are so many other options? (…)

• More at: Twitchy - Trump's Surgeon General Nominee Praised Facebook for Its Censorship During COVID
https://twitchy.com/brettt/2024/11/23/trumps-surgeon-general-nominee-praised-facebook-for-its-censorship-during-covid-n2404169

00:54

The Fools Who Made This, Who Think This Is Pro-Kamala, Shows How Out Of Touch With Reality They Are

more_vert

NewsVids check_circle

1 views 2 years ago

Posted • September 24, 2024: Kamala Harris surely is wracking up some endorsements. Except they're the kind of endorsements that aren't exactly going to make more people vote for you, including Liz and Dick Cheney, as well as Vladimir Putin and the IRS Agents Union. Imagine thinking that helps you, but her people are touting these things. The Lincoln Project has even put out a cartoon ad featuring Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) and Dick Cheney. I'm sure they thought it was clever, but I don't think they realized -- because they're perpetually clueless -- what a great ad for former President Donald Trump this is. The ad has Sanders calling Cheney a "warmonger" and Cheney in return calling Sanders a "commie." -- The Lincoln Project @ProjectLincoln: “Bernie Sanders and Dick Cheney are united on something… that tells us all we need to know.”

"I'm still on the left," Sanders says, while Cheney says he's still "on the right," as they play poker together. "But if we can agree on Trump," Sanders declares. "It means something big," Cheney replies. "Bigger than policy," Sanders says. "Bigger than ideology," Cheney responds. "We're both voting for Kamala Harris," Bernie explains. "Because it's a choice between America," Cheney says. "Or Trump." Sanders finishes. So they really think endorsements from a "commie" and a "warmonger" are good things, that's what they're telling us? That tells us something all right, that when it comes to keeping the establishment candidate they will do anything, throw under any principle or ideology, to keep the oligarchy in power. Not to mention the execrable Lincoln Project endorsing Harris. What an ad for Trump that is. When all the bad come together, you know to vote for the other side.

But that wasn't the only cringey ad for Harris. "Nanny" actress Fran Drescher posted one on TikTok that was sort of a spoof on the "Nanny." But again, like the ad above, it came out looking like a mocking of Harris, "The Kammy." -- Libs of TikTok @libsoftiktok: “I saw it so now you have to. Can’t you feel the joy?” -- This was a hilarious rewrite of history. "She was working at the White House, what a cool VP." Um, no. She was practically invisible except for her failure at the border and until they had to elevate her to the nominee she was the most unpopular VP in recent memory, more unpopular than the four preceding VPs. Only two were more unpopular than her going back to the 1990s: Dan Quayle and…wait for it…Dick Cheney. https://www.yahoo.com/news/fact-check-kamala-harris-most-120000844.html

"Then Biden stopped his campaign." Again, no. Biden was shoved to the side after a concerted effort to push him out by the Democrat elite because they knew he was going to lose. So they disregarded the votes in the primary of more than 14 million people. This wasn't a "George Washington" sacrifice, it was a desperate coup to try to help them win. They didn't even really care about his cognitive decline, they used it to shove him aside as a candidate but then left him there in office. "She's got brains, she's got balls," it continues, but somehow, I don't think she's demonstrated that she has either. And do they know what a woman is, that women don't have certain equipment? The "girl who turned black." Okay, I'm not even going to go there. Then again all they have is the empty "hope and joy" mantra, and even that's recycled and stolen from Barack Obama.

"Republicans are switching," it contends. Yeah, no, Adam Kinzinger and the Cheneys don't count. And if you want to talk switching, have you been checking all the former Democrats who have been fleeing to the Republicans because the Democrats have become crazy, including Elon Musk as well as black, Hispanic, and young voters? It even has the gall to claim that she's going to "save democracy" -- after disregarding the primary vote and shaping out Joe Biden. Not to mention trying to keep opponents off the ballot. They had a list at the end of people involved in that cringe-arama and they all should be embarrassed. None of this fiction told Americans why they should vote for Kamala Harris. As some pointed out, "hope and joy" doesn't feed their families. Some also laughed at how this was supposed to be pro-Harris, but It came across more as a mockery of her. So Kamala was The Nanny for Joe Biden this entire time? ??‍♀️ (…)

• More at: RedState - New Kamala Ads Are So Cringe, Some Think They're Actually for Trump
https://redstate.com/nick-arama/2024/09/23/cringeworthy-harris-ads-n2179691
Rumble: New Kamala Ads Are So Cringe, Some Think They're Actually For Trump
https://rumble.com/v5g4xm2-new-kamala-ads-are-so-cringe-some-think-theyre-actually-for-trump.html

01:04

Meet The White Verson Of Jussie Smollett

more_vert

NewsVids check_circle

1 views 2 years ago

keyboard_arrow_left

Tim Pool

Alex Jones Show

Bannons War Room

Trump

navigate_next

Quantum Financial System (QFS) Blockchain Watermark Explained

more_vert

MeThePerson check_circle

1 views 3 years ago

10:12

PETRAS PUCKAR 22

more_vert

SveaKanal check_circle

1 views 2 years ago

49:20

West Admits Ukraine is Losing, Encourages Ukrainians to Fight on Anyway

more_vert

The New Atlas check_circle

1 views 2 years ago

25:18

Ledaren 54: Visst kan banken sno dina pengar - men vågar de göra det, efter Hiroshima?

more_vert

SveaKanal check_circle

1 views 2 years ago

Den här ledaren kommer ta upp de fallgropar som vi lärt oss av historien, att vi kan ramla i, om vi förlitar oss på att systemet fungerar som det är tänkt även när katastrofen inträffar. Tyvärr gör det sällan det, just när det som mest behövs. Vi måste alltså ta höjd inte bara för själva katastrofen, som t ex kan innebära att vår pension tappar 50% av sitt värde, våra barn blir arbetslösa och att våra besparingar kommer falla lika mycket. Dessutom kommer banksystemet självt fallera, och när du väl får tillträde till dina konton och depåer igen, så kan någon annan ha lagt beslag på dina tillgodohavanden. För att det har begåtts bedrägerier, och för att de som begått dem räknas som 'systembärande' och faktiskt kan ha bättre laglig rätt till dem, om du inte kan bevisa olagligheterna.

Somliga av er känner till en del av det här. Det kanske inte heller kommer som en överraskning för många. Men hur gör vi då för att skydda oss? Personligen så tror jag att det finns en risk för att faran överdrivs, trots att allt det här är sant. Vi kan agera, allt är inte förlorat om vi håller huvudet kallt. Och framförallt, jag är övertygad om att detta scenario, totalt kaos, på sikt inte bara är en risk, utan också en möjlighet.

Det som fyller oss med panik vill få oss att störta iväg med facklan tänd, utan att lyssna. Men som 'trackern' Conny Andersson säger, att vara paranoid är inte detsamma som att vara vaksam. Låt oss utnyttja den goda vakenheten. Låt oss tänka efter före, och framförallt, inse att riskminimering inte är detsamma som riskoptimering. Det går inte att undvika alla risker, du måste välja dem du kan hantera. Och för att kunna välja rätt måste du informera dig och hålla dig uppdaterad.

PS. Angående aktieinvesteringar, inte minst i gruvaktier, som jag tog upp i förra programmet, så måste man inse att den värdering som görs nästan alltid korrelerar bäst med den som gjordes i ögonblicket innan. Att HA rätt innebär inte att man kommer FÅ rätt, inte förrän alla andra inser att det är så det ligger till. DS.