Richard Dawkins on Jordan Peterson's Theology

Richard Dawkins recently commented on what he thought of Jordan Peterson’s ideas on Theology. Dawkins replied by stating that he had great respect for Peterson’s battle against the woke agenda to cancel him and yet considered his ideas to be ‘bullsh*t’. This comment displays the complete and utterly vile morality of the man, Richard Dawkins. This was not some offhand comment spoken in haste, nor was it in any way meant in jest. Dawkins went out of his way to repeat that he had ‘great respect’ for Peterson. Which of course is a complete lie. Anyone who has even a modicum of respect for another would never broadly label their ideas as bullsh*t. For example, I have absolutely no respect for Dawkin’s infantile arguments on the creation of life, so I have no qualms about calling his book, ‘The Selfish Gene’ total bullsh*t. If I had respect for someone, I may be inclined to say, “I have great respect for this individuals’ efforts in this area, but I have to strongly disagree with their ideas on such-and-such a subject.” This is an obvious example of what it means to display respect. Dawkins on the other hand is so disturbed by any comments that might even remotely ascribe respect to God, that he's compelled to use as disrespectful a term as he could muster. I would remind any audience of Dawkins comments on Peterson that it is Dawkins ideas which are full of sh*t. His book The Selfish Gene wastes the readers time with hours and hours of convoluted wordsmithing only to reach the moronic and intellectually stunted conclusion that the first cell just ‘had to have happened’ and that eventually a cell ‘just had’ to have been able to self-replicate. When pressed, Dawkins even goes on to try and support his ignorant theories with the possibility of the first cells being created by an alien civilization. He will use any reasoning at his disposal to support his arrogant atheism. And that’s exactly what his entire character consists of. He is so arrogant that he has set himself up as his own god. As far as his writings are concerned, Dawkins can best be described as an overpriced intellectual charlatan. One must pay an expensive price of time to get through his obtuse and blustering books only to realize that this lame academic, that is Dawkins, is completely and utterly without substance. Dawkins will be tormented in the eternal flames of regret when he finally wakes up and realizes that he has been a total fool. Creation itself has been a witness to his own soul. He has ignored the valuable witness of superior intellects such as Peterson and many others throughout history and instead has installed himself as his own Molech. A deaf and dumb idol who is miserable and poor and wretched. Richard Dawkins’ false respect is yet another example of his extreme snobbish pomposity. It is he himself who is full of bullsh*t and history will prove his ideas to have been the result of a mentally insignificant mind. Dawkins arguments are no different from the age-old example of the individual who finds a watch on the ground and proclaims, “well it just had to have assembled itself”. His complete lack of sincerity in proclaiming respect for Peterson should be recognized for what it is, a blatant lie. A blatant lie from someone who is empowered and directed by the father of lies; the enemy of humanity.