Conspiracy Theory: Trudeau, Russia, and Things That Go Boom

more_vert

Patrick Peace check_circle

29 views 6 days ago

00:01:02

Taking a break for the summer!

more_vert

Patrick Peace check_circle

1 views 4 months ago

00:02:32

Don't listen to your negative self. Defeat anxiety with positive words.

more_vert

Patrick Peace check_circle

1 views 5 months ago

00:10:31

Beat Self-Defeat

more_vert

Patrick Peace check_circle

1 views 5 months ago

00:06:19

Book Review - The Case for Christ by Lee Strobel - Part 5 of 5

more_vert

Patrick Peace check_circle

1 views 5 months ago

00:03:32

Happy Saturday

more_vert

Patrick Peace check_circle

1 views 9 months ago

00:14:57

Why atheism fails. The third lie from lucifer.

more_vert

Patrick Peace check_circle

1 views 9 months ago

00:10:16

Richard Dawkins is faithless and what else?

more_vert

Patrick Peace check_circle

1 views 9 months ago

00:31:53

Replying to comments from atheists.

more_vert

Patrick Peace check_circle

1 views 9 months ago

00:03:45

To Make You Feel My Love. ~ Bob Dylan/Adle Cover

more_vert

Patrick Peace check_circle

1 views 9 months ago

00:08:45

Do I hate Richard Dawkins? No.

more_vert

Patrick Peace check_circle

1 views 10 months ago

,Do I hate Richard Dawkins? Someone commented to me yesterday that I was 100 times harsher towards Dawkins than he was towards Peterson. I would like to comment that I don’t hate Dawkins, I hate what he represents, I hate the team that he plays for. The reason I attacked him 100 times worse is because I know people have lost their faith due to the efforts of Dawkins. More than once I have heard testimony from individuals who have declared, “I used to believe in God but after reading Dawkins (or hearing him speak somewhere) I am now an atheist.” I would not be surprised if Dawkins himself were smugly proud of this accomplishment. Dawkins has declared that there is no soul, no spirit that lives on after death. But scripture declares that it appointed unto man once to die and after this, the judgment. When Dawkins leaves this world, it is then that his eyes will be opened and he will be forced to face the sovereign creator of the world, the creator and sustainer of all life. Then he will gasp, “What have I done?” But it will be too late. Perhaps God will ask him why he stubbornly kicked against the pricks of his own conscience, and it is likely that Dawkins will be speechless. Or perhaps he will wail in agony as he is consumed with regret. Or perhaps God will assign him a hovel in heaven so that all may see the once proud academic has achieved a place of lowest honor in eternity. Perhaps God will cut him in pieces and assign him a place with the unbelievers. Whatever his fate, it will not be pretty unless he repents. God is as close to Dawkins as he ever has been; and Richard only has to open his heart to God. And isn’t this is why so many are atheist? They complain, “If your God kills people then I don’t want any part of that. If your Bible describes God as capable of killing babies than I want no part of your religion.” Sadly, they have never experienced anything beyond their own faulty reasoning. Atheists have not experienced the fearsomeness of God nor the abject evil of lucifer. Ou teacher, Christ taught us to fear the one who is able, after he has killed, to destroy both body and soul in hell. So why do I bother? Why not let Dawkins continue on his merry way? It is partly from my own experience. I have experienced a glimpse of God, a glimpse that debilitated me and left me begging for mercy; an experience that broke my psyche and crushed any elevated regards for this life. Similarly, I have tasted evil. The absolute lack of mercy and pure hatred that our enemy has for humanity; if atheists were aware of this evil, they would run in the opposite direction. Scripture tells us that hell was made for the devil and his angels. Dawkins and his team of atheists try to play this off as fairy tales. They bring to shipwreck the faith of many. God will hold them in the balance, and they will be found wanting. They need a savior to escape the sentence of hell. How I wish others could see what I have seen, how I wish they could experience a tiny sliver of the majesty of God, if only their eyes would open to the fact that they are fighting on the side of lucifer, the complete enemy of humanity. This is what I hate, I hate the enemy of humanity who promises life and delivers death. He promises happiness and delivers misery. He has no mercy. With God there is mercy. With God there is a hope for salvation. With God, all things are possible. Search your conscience and see for yourself. You don’t need me to tell you. God has provided witness within our hearts and access to the kingdom of God is within us. Listen. Open your ears and listen to what God is telling you within your own soul. Have you lost your hearing. Richard Dawkins cannot save you. His proud arrogance will not deliver you in the day of judgment and that day must be faced by all who walk the Earth. No, I don’t hate Richard Dawkins, I hate what he has delivered to humanity. He has been a spokesperson on behalf of lucifer who continues to ask, “yea, hath God said?” He gets people to doubt, he gets them to doubt scripture, he gets them to doubt a God who can be both love and ferocity. He gets them to put trust in their own pompous ego rather than trust the only one who can save their souls. No, I don’t hate Richard Dawkins. I pity him with disdain. Dawkins will be regulated to a footnote in history. His writings will be exposed as mostly circular arguments of no consequence, and his name will fade into obscurity where he belongs. And what about you? What team do you want to join? Your soul is worth much more than that. Put God first and he will rescue you from the misery of life on Earth. Put God first and he will rescue you from the humiliation of death. Dawkins has chosen to put God last. I urge you, put God first and He will show the path to eternal life that is perfect for you.

00:09:54

Richard Dawkins on Jordan Peterson's Theology

more_vert

Patrick Peace check_circle

1 views 10 months ago

,Richard Dawkins recently commented on what he thought of Jordan Peterson’s ideas on Theology. Dawkins replied by stating that he had great respect for Peterson’s battle against the woke agenda to cancel him and yet considered his ideas to be ‘bullsh*t’. This comment displays the complete and utterly vile morality of the man, Richard Dawkins. This was not some offhand comment spoken in haste, nor was it in any way meant in jest. Dawkins went out of his way to repeat that he had ‘great respect’ for Peterson. Which of course is a complete lie. Anyone who has even a modicum of respect for another would never broadly label their ideas as bullsh*t. For example, I have absolutely no respect for Dawkin’s infantile arguments on the creation of life, so I have no qualms about calling his book, ‘The Selfish Gene’ total bullsh*t. If I had respect for someone, I may be inclined to say, “I have great respect for this individuals’ efforts in this area, but I have to strongly disagree with their ideas on such-and-such a subject.” This is an obvious example of what it means to display respect. Dawkins on the other hand is so disturbed by any comments that might even remotely ascribe respect to God, that he's compelled to use as disrespectful a term as he could muster. I would remind any audience of Dawkins comments on Peterson that it is Dawkins ideas which are full of sh*t. His book The Selfish Gene wastes the readers time with hours and hours of convoluted wordsmithing only to reach the moronic and intellectually stunted conclusion that the first cell just ‘had to have happened’ and that eventually a cell ‘just had’ to have been able to self-replicate. When pressed, Dawkins even goes on to try and support his ignorant theories with the possibility of the first cells being created by an alien civilization. He will use any reasoning at his disposal to support his arrogant atheism. And that’s exactly what his entire character consists of. He is so arrogant that he has set himself up as his own god. As far as his writings are concerned, Dawkins can best be described as an overpriced intellectual charlatan. One must pay an expensive price of time to get through his obtuse and blustering books only to realize that this lame academic, that is Dawkins, is completely and utterly without substance. Dawkins will be tormented in the eternal flames of regret when he finally wakes up and realizes that he has been a total fool. Creation itself has been a witness to his own soul. He has ignored the valuable witness of superior intellects such as Peterson and many others throughout history and instead has installed himself as his own Molech. A deaf and dumb idol who is miserable and poor and wretched. Richard Dawkins’ false respect is yet another example of his extreme snobbish pomposity. It is he himself who is full of bullsh*t and history will prove his ideas to have been the result of a mentally insignificant mind. Dawkins arguments are no different from the age-old example of the individual who finds a watch on the ground and proclaims, “well it just had to have assembled itself”. His complete lack of sincerity in proclaiming respect for Peterson should be recognized for what it is, a blatant lie. A blatant lie from someone who is empowered and directed by the father of lies; the enemy of humanity.

00:10:44

Happy New Year ~ 2024 Message

more_vert

Patrick Peace check_circle

1 views 10 months ago

00:05:46

Merry Christmas Message for Lloyd Duncan - GFY

more_vert

Patrick Peace check_circle

1 views 11 months ago

00:17:31

Reframe Your Brain by Scott Adams - Book Review - Part 2

more_vert

Patrick Peace check_circle

1 views 11 months ago

00:15:36

Reframe Your Brain by Scott Adams - Book Review - Part 1

more_vert

Patrick Peace check_circle

1 views 11 months ago

00:19:15

Commentary on Flat Earth Theory

more_vert

Patrick Peace check_circle

1 views 11 months ago

00:07:12

The Bitcoin Standard by Saifedean Ammous - Book Review

more_vert

Patrick Peace check_circle

1 views 11 months ago

00:05:33

Video for Abby - My favorite songs this week.

more_vert

Patrick Peace check_circle

1 views 1 year ago

00:10:53

November 14, 2023 Update

more_vert

Patrick Peace check_circle

1 views 1 year ago

00:10:01

Thoughts from Matthew Chapter 10

more_vert

Patrick Peace check_circle

1 views 1 year ago

00:20:00

Pastor Disaster - Bubba Copeland. | Instructions on prayer from Matthew Chapter 6.

more_vert

Patrick Peace check_circle

1 views 1 year ago

00:11:20

Don Shipley - My new favorite preacher.

more_vert

Patrick Peace check_circle

1 views 1 year ago

00:11:30

My favorite song this week. Dog days are over.

more_vert

Patrick Peace check_circle

1 views 1 year ago

00:08:06

Thoughts on John 6

more_vert

Patrick Peace check_circle

1 views 1 year ago

00:08:19

New writing project plans.

more_vert

Patrick Peace check_circle

1 views 1 year ago

00:12:17

Heavenly Things from John 3

more_vert

Patrick Peace check_circle

1 views 1 year ago

00:19:47

The sheep and the goats. Video for Sister Shawie.

more_vert

Patrick Peace check_circle

1 views 1 year ago

00:03:52

Missed Opportunity for Pierre Poilievre and the Conservative Party

more_vert

Patrick Peace check_circle

1 views 1 year ago

00:09:50

Using pronouns.

more_vert

Patrick Peace check_circle

1 views 1 year ago

00:01:19

My favorite song this week.🎵🎼🎸🎶

more_vert

Patrick Peace check_circle

1 views 1 year ago

00:11:50

Conservative Party Convention 2023

more_vert

Patrick Peace check_circle

1 views 1 year ago

00:12:02

Being productive in old age.

more_vert

Patrick Peace check_circle

1 views 1 year ago

00:23:57

A message to PPC voters in Canada.

more_vert

Patrick Peace check_circle

1 views 1 year ago

00:13:52

The Genius Within - Discovering the Intelligence of Every Living Thing

more_vert

Patrick Peace check_circle

1 views 1 year ago

00:06:37

A Guide for the Perplexed - E.F. Schumacher Part 3

more_vert

Patrick Peace check_circle

1 views 1 year ago

00:13:02

A Guide for the Perplexed - E.F. Schumacher Part 2

more_vert

Patrick Peace check_circle

1 views 1 year ago

00:11:13

Prayer Time at the Park

more_vert

Patrick Peace check_circle

1 views 1 year ago

00:14:37

A Guide for the Perplexed - E.F. Schumacher

more_vert

Patrick Peace check_circle

1 views 1 year ago

00:12:34

Rational Recovery by Jack Trimpey - Book Review

more_vert

Patrick Peace check_circle

1 views 1 year ago

,A review of Rational Recovery - The New Cure for Substance Addiction by Jack Trimpey - The Revolutionary Alternative to Alcoholics Anonymous 1 - Author describes the ‘allure’ & ‘benefits’ of drinking in too much detail. (Needs to read ‘Blink’ by Malcolm Gladwell.) 2 – Author is too combative and essentially malicious towards AA – and he spends too much time bashing them - unproductive. (Those who are not against us are for us.) (Pg 72) But there is no Treatment for addiction any more than there would be a treatment for dancing. (Pg 75) What is to stop anyone from quitting the use of a substance? Whatever appears as the answer to this question is the sound of the Addictive Voice. (Pg 76) If you let your eyes follow the bouncing dollar, you may notice that addiction treatment benefits those who treat far more than those who are treated. (Pg 125) “It is hard to control a lion on a leash. That’s why we keep them in cages.” Referring to moderation as trying to hold a lion on a leash and abstinence as putting alcohol consumption away – in a cage so to speak. You have met the enemy, and it is within you. (Was similar to a famous quote by Nietzsche) (You are your own best friend.) (pg.149) Language center of the brain, The inner voice that must be recognized = focused self-awareness. (Pg. 150) The reasons listed for drinking (Pg 151) should be presented in the negative; for example Number 1 should read: Drinking is not good for me. It is not good for the heart,,etc. As written, the author is unintentionally reinforcing the reasons people use to drink! Although it may be useful to recognize this “Addiction Diction.” (Pg 152) the author should read ‘Blink’ by Malcolm Gladwell and incorporate a better, (and safer) delivery of these reasons people use for drinking. e.g. Don’t write detailed descriptions about how delicious food is, if you are writing a diet book! (Page 190) In traditional programs, one is said to be at high risk of drinking alcohol if any of the “HALT conditions” exist. HALT is the acronym for “hungry, angry, lonely, or tired.” (Pg 238) Now, you know what it was (the inner 'Beast') that got the better of you—a part of you that is part of being human but not the essence of being human. Not a human being. (Pg 244) Addiction is a state of chemically enhanced stupidity that can be overcome by abstinence. (Pg 245) Remember that quitting addictions does not make people into ideal personalities. (Pg 254) reasonable, logical efforts that usually involve promises to themselves and others to drink less, or to drink less frequently, only at certain times, or to quit for a period of time and then drink only moderately. There is nothing wrong with this, and some people, however few, succeed in achieving the goal of moderate drinking. This simple approach to addiction or substance abuse often produces results and costs nothing. (Pg 295) The quest for status—and funding—has led to progressive medicalization of human services in America and has spawned practices that offend common sense, produce little, and very often create new problems worse than the original.

00:20:00

Beyond Synchronicity - The Law of Attraction According to Physicists Comments

more_vert

Patrick Peace check_circle

1 views 1 year ago

00:10:30

An additional promise for you.

more_vert

Patrick Peace check_circle

1 views 1 year ago

00:09:08

Where do the stars come from? How are stars born?

more_vert

Patrick Peace check_circle

1 views 1 year ago

00:08:37

Disturbing the Universe - Freeman Dyson - Part 10

more_vert

Patrick Peace check_circle

1 views 1 year ago

00:09:14

Disturbing the Universe - Freeman Dyson - Part 9

more_vert

Patrick Peace check_circle

1 views 1 year ago

00:15:14

Disturbing the Universe - Freeman Dyson - Part 8

more_vert

Patrick Peace check_circle

1 views 1 year ago

,Disturbing the Universe - Freeman Dyson - Part 8 Chapters 18,19,20, & 21 Page 201: If the generation time is twenty years, comparable with a human generation, then the automata do not change dramatically the conditions of human society. In this case they can multiply and produce new wealth only at about the same rate to which we are accustomed in our normal industrial growth. If the generation time is one year, the situation is different. A single machine then produces a progeny of a million in twenty years, a billion in thirty years, and the economic basis of society can be changed in one human generation. ....bacteria and protozoa, the simplest truly self-reproducing organisms, have generation times of a few hours or days. Page 207 "Founders of religions are not to be held responsible for the dogmas which their followers build upon their words. Page 216: Many biologists and chemists have concluded from inadequate evidence that the development of intelligent life should be a frequent occurence in our galaxy. Having examined their evidence and heard their arguments, I consider it just as likely that no intelligent species other than our own has ever existed. The question can only be answered by observation. Page 217: A reasonable long-range program of searching for evidence of intelligence in the universe is indistinguishable from a reasonable long-range program of general astronomical exploration. Page 220: "...one would expect, when an intelligent species evolves the use of language , that there would be only one language. one would expect that the first speaking animals would evolve a fixed structure of words and meanings, as immutable as the genetic code that evolved the billion years earlier. This is NOT a naive expectation. A convoluted Darwinian explanation does nothing to change the fact that diversity of language has slowed human co-existence and progress, and just as certainly and obviously has done nothing to speed up global co-operation. The divine explanation given in Genesis, as an indirect means to slow the perfidity of humans, is just as reasonable, if not more so, than one based on natural selection or any other fanciful Darwinian-based explanation. Page 221: All three fundamental 'inventions' mention by Freeman Dyson on page 221 death, sex, and speciation require a supreme, exongenous intelligence. The anthropomorphical description used by Dyson, itself, points to the need of an 'inventor'. Page 229: Long ago God invented the tree, a device for converting air, water and sunlight into fuel and other useful chemicals. A tree is more versatile and more economical than any device our gray technology has imagined. Page 233: So long as mankind remains confined to this planet, the ethic of human brotherhood must prevail over our desire for diversity. Page 237: "...in the long run, the sane will adapt and survive better than the insane....Sanity is, in its essence, nothing more than the ability to live in harmony with nature's laws.