Nazis of Ukraine: Child Boot Camps to Kidnapping and Torture in the Street

A History of NATO and Nazis
https://www.mintpressnews.com/history-nato-nazis-ukraine-asa-winstanley/279972/

Paperclip also brought over other similarly monstrous scientists, including Hubertus Strughold, who had murdered human test subjects taken from concentration camps through exposure to extreme cold, intensive air preasure, and surgery without anesthetic, and Kurt Blome, the head of Nazi bioweapon research who deliberately infected concentration camp inmates with numerous different diseases, many of them deadly. For the United States, Strughold’s work would prove invaluable in making manned spaceflight even remotely possible, while Blome’s research would shape the development of American chemical weapon and nerve gas programs before he was sent to West Germany to work on still undisclosed secret projects for the military. Of note, Blome had also been a collaborator with the infamous Japanese “Unit 731,” which killed hundreds of thousands of prisoners in inhumane experiments.

Similar to the fate of von Braun and the other Paperclip scientists, most of the scientists in Unit 731 were also granted immunity for their numerous war crimes, with the United States using their research
in combination with Blome’s to develop bioweapons of their own, later deployed in the Korean War.
https://ebeggin.substack.com/p/ratlines-nato-and-the-fourth-reich?s=r

NATO’s Nazi Beginnings: How the West implemented Hitler’s goals
Many writers have documented how British and American elites bankrolled Hitler’s rise to power and not until he turned his forces westward did they begin to mount defensive actions against the Third Reich. In Britain, elite members of The Right Club, often with government collusion, secretly supported Hitler’s actions against the Jews and against communists and socialists. The Duke of Wellington was a noted anti-semite and a member of the Right Club. Edward the VIII, known as "the Traitor King" was close friends with Adolf Hitler and was forced to give up his throne, not because of Wallis Simpson, but because it was discovered that he was passing British war operations documents to the Nazis. The aristocracy, after all, have never submitted to sharing the wealth with the lesser classes and Adolf was equally amenable to those ends, the destruction of the untermenschen being foremost in Plan A of his conquest strategy for Europe and Russia

The Bank for International Settlements was a joint creation in the 1930’s of the western world’s central banks, including the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Montagu Norman, governor of the Bank of England was a wholehearted supporter of Hitler and, when the Nazis marched into Austria in 1938 most of the country’s gold was packed and loaded into vaults controlled by the Bank for International Settlements - the main central bank for the western world. One day later the Nazis marched into Prague, took the directors of the Czech National Bank as hostages and demanded they cede control of the country’s gold reserves representing some $48 million. Informed that the gold had already been transferred to London’s vaults, efforts were made to contact Montagu Norman - who immediately transferred the money to the Germans to outfit their war machine.

One of the leading lights in furthering the rise of Adolf Hitler and the Nazi party was none other than Prescott Bush, father to George Herbert Walker Bush and grandfather to G.W. Bush, both future presidents
and G.W. H. Bush as head of the CIA. These war criminals have maintained their popularity among right-wing Americans mostly due to a compliant media that has obscured their Nazi-loving history from the populace at large.　

In October 1942...Prescott Bush was managing partner of Brown Brothers Harriman. His 18-year-old son George, the future U.S. President, had just begun training to become a naval pilot. On Oct. 20, 1942, the U.S. government ordered the seizure of Nazi German banking operations in New York City which were being conducted by Prescott Bush. Under the Trading with the Enemy Act, the government took over the Union Banking Corporation, in which Bush was a director. The U.S. Alien Property Custodian seized Union Banking Corp.’s stock shares, all of which were owned by Prescott Bush, E. Roland "Bunny" Harriman, three Nazi executives, and two other associates of Bush. [1]

President Bush’s family had already played a central role in financing and arming Adolf Hitler for his takeover of Germany...By deciding that Prescott Bush and the other directors of the Union Banking Corp.
were legally front men for the Nazis, the government avoided the more important historical issue: In what way were Hitler’s Nazis themselves hired, armed and instructed by the New York and London clique of which Prescott Bush was an executive manager? [2]

Among those supporting the rise to power of Adolf Hitler was industrialist Henry Ford, a noted Jew hater. Among his other crimes, Ford..."refused to build aircraft engines for England and instead built supplies of the 5-ton military trucks that were the backbone of German army transportation." [3] The list of US industrialists linked to the Nazis is too long to recount here but can be accessed in Charles Higham’s
excellent book, Trading With The Enemy: the Nazi-american
plot 1933 - 1949. [4]

Clearly the west’s leading financiers were in Hitler’s camp, busy supplying funds for his military buildup and not till he betrayed them by attacking England did the Allies unite to defeat the Nazi forces.
In this effort an unholy alliance was formed; that of the western powers and of the Soviet Union, the major force in defeating Hitler’s legions. Yet long before the war ended the Brits and Americans were plotting to
redirect their energy against the Soviets, a déjà vu of the 1918 invasion that the west mounted against the Bolsheviks and certainly the most unknown major event of modern history. To this end the British and US
rescued the most murderous Nazi war criminals being sought by investigators of the same governments and mingled them into British and US apparatus of terror.

As Michael McClintock writes:

It was immediately after the creation of the United Nations that American leaders found it necessary—as a matter of interest—to break the new rules they publicly lauded. In doing so, they developed new systems by which to evade accountability for lawbreaking–including an enormous apparatus for covert intervention–and, by means of extraordinary effort, to present the United States’ actions, whatever their nature, as in accord with international law. [5

At the same time as the west was planning its covert actions against its WWII ally, it also created the formation of the terror club known as NATO, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. Almost in its entirety it
was a Nazi enterprise. Nazi General Reinhard Gehlen, for example, who had headed the Russia Desk in the Oberkommando der Wermacht (OKW - Hitler’s Supreme Headquarters) and a consultant on the Final Solution, was secretly brought to the United States where he would deliver his vast storehouse of previously hidden files on the Soviet Union and then set up the Russia Desk for the soon-to-be-formed CIA. [6]

Gehlen would then be returned to postwar Germany where he was put in position as head of Germany’s new Bundesnachrichtendienst (BND), the German Secret Intelligence Service. In essence, two Russia desks
(at least) now functioned instead of just one; both with the same ultimate aim: destroy the Soviet Union and communism.

Hundreds if not thousands of old Nazis found new life working for the US, Britain, and Canada as the Cold War was cranked up and now the mass murderers were brought into policy making for the same Lords
of the Manor who had supported Hitler to begin with. And, with the same old Nazis back in charge, every foul means was employed against the Soviets to prevent any challenge of global capital’s right to dictate the terms of enslavement.

West Germany, now being run by ex-Nazis under Chancellor Konrad Adenauer, joined NATO in 1954 and Gehlen liaised with his pro-Nazi mentor Allen Dulles who would become head of the CIA, with brother
John Foster as Secretary of State. Soon NATO began appointing the old tried and true Nazis into high positions within the organization.

General Hans Speidel, for example, became commander-in-chief in 1957 of AFCENT (Allied Forces Central Europe). Nazi Admiral Friedrich Guggenberger joined the highly important NATO military committee in Washington and General Adolf Heusinger (Gehlen’s old chief at Hitler’s OKW), became its chairman. At Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers in Europe (SHAPE), Gehlen managed to install several Nazi collaborators into vital positions [7]. Amongst these was Col. Hennig Strumpell, who became deputy to British Maj. Gen. Charles Traver, the Assistant Chief of Staff (Intelligence) at SHAPE. Col. Heinz Koller-Kraus was made head of logistics at Speidel’s AFCENT. Many other Gehlen men would soon join NATO to define its policies. [8]

With the same Nazis well integrated into NATO and the CIA becoming an extension of Gehlen’s old Nazi intelligence agency, the Nieue World Ordnung was essentially relocated from the Reichstag in Berlin and
dropped into the Pentagon and CIA Langley, Virginia.

Added to the anti-Soviet battle plans, US elites recognized the value of Goebbel’s Ministry of Truth and turned the lessons learned into the world’s most sophisticated propaganda network ever created. All western wars would now be given illusionary titles, such as: "wars for democracy", "wars for peace", "wars for justice", "wars for humanitarianism" and on and on. The corporate funded elites that run the UK and Canada were quick to adopt the same essential elements.

Two of those components of the propaganda wars for the US/UK/Nazi Nieue World Ordnung was the creation of Radio Free Europe and Radio Liberty - both staffed with Gehlen’s old Nazis and funded by the CIA. [9]

These Nazi mass murderers set up an Hungarian Desk, provided arms and assistance to underground pro-Nazi elements in Hungary and together with the CIA, instigated the Hungarian uprising - which the Soviets brutally put down [10]. The prime use of this episode however, had little to do with the dead and dying, rather it was the propaganda value which portrayed an "Evil Empire" that had to be destroyed. [11]

Dr. Eberhardt Taubert joined the Nazi party in 1931 and was soon promoted to the rank of Sturmführer, following
Goebbels to the Ministry of Propaganda. After the war Taubert slid down to South Africa where he found comfort
among the neo-Nazis in power in Johannesburg busy designing the apartheid system. In 1950 he returned to Germany and joined his old Nazi pal Reinhard Gehlen, becoming a member of the BND. In his new BND/CIA
post, Taubert became chairman of the CIA-backed "National Association for Peace and Freedom" becoming also an adviser to German Minister of Defense, ex-Nazi Franz Josef Strauss and was then assigned by Strauss to NATO as adviser to the "Psychological Warfare Department". Goebbel’s Ministry of Truth being recirculated
to feed the Christian fundamentalists some newly constructed, yet old and familiar Tales from the Dark, only having different packaging. [12]

NATO has also been closely linked to a series of terrorist bombings in Italy in the 1980s in order to create a "Strategy of Tension" designed to allow the fascist right wing into power and thereby bring "stability" to
the country. This program made use of numerous far right terrorists like Stefano Delle Chiaie of Ordine
Nuovo and other demented souls who planted bombs in public places that killed hundreds, aided in implementation by Gehlen’s NATO/Nazi terrorists. Though well covered in Europe, thanks to media complicity, the story barely made a blip here.

In essence these and their followers are the people that run NATO, presently killing its way around the world thanks to the likes of Barack Obama, Steve Harper, and the rest of the West’s puppet satraps; while
posing as defenders of humanity. It’s all too much to embrace without losing one’s dinner over and over again.
https://www.voltairenet.org/article174656.html

From an undisclosed location in Ukraine, a former Georgian soldier runs a combined tactical operations center and military training camp that sends U.S. and other foreign fighters to battle Russia.

“We are still in the process of recruitment,” Mamuka Mamulashvili told Military Times in a Skype interview.

“There are a lot of guys joining us. On the list, there are now about 750 men, mostly from Georgia, and the United Kingdom. We have a lot of Americans.”

Mamulashvili leads the Georgian National Legion, one of several paramilitaries integrated into the Ukrainian
armed forces after the War in the Donbas, part of the larger conflict between Russia and Ukraine, began in 2014.

Now, following Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine on Feb. 24, some U.S. military veterans eager for a
war with what they see as a righteous cause have pledged to come to Ukraine’s defense.

https://www.militarytimes.com/flashpoints/ukraine/2022/03/14/us-veterans-head-to-ukraine-to-fight-but-zelenskyys-legion-faces-hurdles/

NATO, Nukes, and Nazis: The Untold Story of West Germany’s Entry Into the Cold War

In March of 1947, US president Harry Truman announced the "Truman Doctrine" in a speech to congress, where he pledged to contain communism anywhere it may spread. This doctrine was first exercised on July 4, 1948, when Truman pledged to put down communist uprisings in Turkey and Greece. In September of 1947, the US passed the National Security Act of 1947, significantly expanding the powers of the president to wage war, creating the US Air Force while integrating the Strategic Air Command, responsible for delivering nuclear weapons, and restructuring the US government in a way which would make foreign interventions much more easy, in direct contradiction to the non-interventionist philosophy which had been laid out by the Founding Fathers and largely adhered to for the first 150 years or so of
America’s existence.

In April of 1949, NATO was formed, guaranteeing that the US and other western countries would oppose the USSR in Europe. On the 23rd of May, 1949, less than two weeks after the Berlin Blockade ended, the
portions of Germany occupied by the Western Allies were unified into one country: West Germany. To the Soviet Union, this was an extremely provocative action. It ran directly contrary to the plans of unification laid
out at the end of WWII. Furthermore, the Soviets knew that the only Germans with any political experience had been leaders of the Nazi party, which had murdered 26 million Soviet citizens just a few years prior. In August of 1949, the Soviet Union detonated its first atomic bomb, RDS-1. Up until this point, the United States had
been the only country in the world with nuclear weapons. As such, further countering the Soviet Union and increasing western military presence in Europe was seen as necessary by the western military establishment.

At this point, pursuing a rearmament of West Germany became formal policy of the US and other western powers, in order to provide an avenue for the US to move air bases containing nuclear bombers all the way up to the borders of the Eastern Bloc. In December of 1949,
the Chinese Communist Party won the civil war, further fueling the American and western motivation to "contain" communism.

It should be noted that many in West Germany at this time did not favor German rearmament themselves. Left-wing elements and other antiwar groups viewed rearmament as a resurrection of Nazi ultra-nationalism,
while right-wing elements thought that the military would never be an adequate fighting force without the reformation of the Wehrmacht. Furthermore, France, which had been occupied during WWII, was also
opposed to West Germany’s rearmament. As a result, it is unlikely that West German rearmament would have happened without outside intervention. However, the western powers were dedicated to "countering" communism in Europe and were willing to work with West Germany towards this goal. In 1950, the West German government under chancellor Konrad Adenauer announced a number of concessions to the country which the Western Powers would have to fulfill in exchange for their rearmament and entry into the
Cold War.

These concessions included:

The release of all German soldiers convicted as war criminals
The official defamation of German soldiers by the Allied powers would end
Measures to assure the welfare of former soldiers and their widows would have to be taken

Ultimately, the western powers conceded to most of these demands, ending their de-Nazification programs and releasing numerous Nazi war criminals convicted during the postwar trials, including Hermann Reinecke, who administered the system which handled Soviet POWs, that killed over 3 million people, and Hermann Hoth, who played a key role on the Eastern front. In 1951, rearmament of West Germany began. Furthermore, many other former Nazis were now playing key roles in the West German government and society. Hans Speidel,
a former Lieutenant General in the Nazi Army, had been appointed as the military adviser to Adenauer’s government and played a key role in promoting German rearmament. Hasso von Manteufell, another former
Nazi General, was elected to the West German legislature.

These actions enraged the Soviet Union. It was the strongest indication possible to them, short of declaring war on the country, that the Western Powers were not, in fact, interested in having the USSR be a free, prosperous nation. Instead, the United States and NATO were interested in doing exactly the same thing the Nazis did:
invading their nation, slaughtering civilians by the tens of millions, and annexing much of their territory in the name of "liberating" the Soviets from Communism. After all, why would they be backing their former leaders?

It is important to note here that, following the death of Joseph Stalin in March of 1953 and particularly under the leadership of Nikita Khrushchev starting in September of that year, the USSR became much more devoted to preserving international peace, arguably as much as the United States. The USSR frequently tried to make
it clear to the west that they did not want war. Khrushchev frequently criticized the USSR’s role in the Cold War, and substantially reduced the size of the nation’s military. He was also a critic of Mutually Assured Destruction
and released many political prisoners jailed during the Stalin era. A reunification of Germany and equitable end to the Cold War almost certainly could have been achieved at this time, as long as a proper power sharing agreement was negotiated and respected by the parties involved. Even Stalin was willing to negotiate for
German reunification.

Despite this, the United States and NATO continued to push for the rearmament of Germany.

The entry of West Germany into NATO was the largest provocation made by the Western Powers in the early Cold War period. The same people who, just a decade earlier, were killing innocent Soviet Citizens
by the tens of millions now made up the very highest ranks of West German government and military. The fact that this happened on May 9, 1955, the ten-year anniversary of the end of WWII in the USSR, was even more symbolic to the Soviets about NATO’s intentions of invading and conquering the Soviet Union. It’s also important to remember that, at this time, the United States had a significant advantage in nuclear weapons technology over the USSR. The US had over 2400 nuclear weapons at this time, had already developed fusion bombs by 1952, and already had hundreds of them in their arsenal, as well as hundreds more fission weapons in addition to those developed by the UK. The USSR, on the other hand, only had about 200 nuclear weapons, most of which were fission bombs, as they had not developed fusion weapons until 1953 (and those were relatively primitive compared to American ones). NATO also had a substantial edge in weapon delivery
technology.

All of this led to the USSR and other Eastern Bloc countries forming the Warsaw pact on May 14, 1955, just five days after West Germany’s entry into NATO and set the stage for the remainder of the Cold War.

One must remember that, when Mikhail Gorbachev proposed ridding the world of nuclear weapons in 1986, it was Ronald Reagan who turned him down, as he thought it would kill support for his Strategic Defense Initiative, or Star Wars missile defense project. Of course, he was either too dumb or had too much money behind him to care that such a system would be necessary once nuclear weapons and missiles were eliminated. This brings up another important point, and that is that all military decisions are ultimately influenced in one way or another by the military-industrial complex. Ever nation that has ever existed has
had a military-industrial complex.

Even now, the United States often backs some of the worst people on the planet to achieve its political aims. From Jihadists in Syria and Yemen, to warlords in Afghanistan and Iraq, this is simply how American foreign policy has functioned since WWII.

The foreign policy establishment does not care whether Democrats or Republicans are in office, as long as they are pro-war and pro-establishment. When it comes to debates over Crimea, Taiwan, Georgia, or any other contentious foreign policy issue, one must remember the appalling reputation America has gained in these matters and that the countries involved will not be afraid to escalate. The United States should not be backing the Speidels, the Chiangs, the Batistas, the Pinochets, and the Yeltsins of the world to achieve its aims. This is true now, it was true in 1945, and it will be true at any point in the future.
https://original.antiwar.com/butone/2021/10/20/nato-nukes-and-nazis-the-untold-story-of-west-germanys-entry-into-the-cold-war/

Guardian newspaper: Ukraine's far-right children's camp: 'I want to bring up a warrior'
5 Sept 2017
In Ukraine, the far-right Azov militia is fighting on the frontline – and running a summer camp for children. The Guardian visited the camp and followed 16-year-old Anton through his experiences. Is Azov really a modern Hitler Youth organisation, or is it trying to prepare young
Ukrainians for the tough reality that awaits them?
https://youtu.be/jiBXmbkwiSw

NATO and Nazis: Did the West push Putin into action on Ukraine?
https://youtu.be/Zd8qVwDx8zc

Women and the Azov battalion in Kyiv, Ukraine
10 Mar 2017
The Azov battalian is far-right and has a reputation for being a fierce fighting force. The group openly uses fascist symbols.

The group is recruiting more and more young people - many of them are women. Concern about democracy in Ukraine is growing.
https://youtu.be/meWM4lChqy4

TIME 8th Jan 2021: Inside A White Supremacist Militia in Ukraine
TIME Correspondent, Simon Shuster, travels to Ukraine in the summer of 2019 to
investigate white supremacists militias that are recruiting people to join their fight.
https://youtu.be/fy910FG46C4

US strategic interests in Ukraine - Why does Ukraine matter to the United States?
AtlanticCouncil 5 Dec 2019

Atlantic Council, along with American Enterprise Institute, American Foreign Policy Council,
Brookings Institution, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Heritage Foundation, Center for
European Policy Analysis, Center for Strategic and International Studies, German Marshall Fund of the
United States, and Jamestown Foundation hosts event titled "US Strategic Interests in Ukraine."
https://youtu.be/DvAQirKH1UQ

These NATO Generals Had Unusual Backgrounds: They Served in the Third Reich
Amid the Cold War two German generals were among the few NATO commanders with direct
experience fighting the Soviets—not to mention the Allies

Thus the Paris Accords of May 5, 1955, authorized the establishment of the Bundeswehr,
the armed forces of the Federal Republic of Germany.

https://web.archive.org/web/20220224212355/https://www.historynet.com/these-nato-generals-had-unusual-backgrounds-they-served-in-the-third-reich/#

Adolf Heusinger: Hitler’s Army Chief And NATO Chairman
In April 1961, he was appointed Chairman of the NATO Military Committee in Washington, D.C., where he served until 1964, when he retired.
https://inserbia.info/adolf-heusinger-hitlers-army-chief-and-nato-chairman/