Quander

24:11

Hardtalk - David Irving

more_vert

KLAUN check_circle

1 views 2 years ago

,

Hardtalk - David Irving (BBC 2000)

batrachious

Dec 21, 2012

http://www.irvingbooks.com/

https://x.com/irving_books

False Flag/Hoax/LIHOP Reading List
*2001 Anthrax Deception MacQueen
*And Nobody Died in Boston, Either
*Another French False Flag 11/13
*Chronicles of False Flag Terror
*Crying Wolf Hate Crime Hoaxes America
*From Orlando to Dallas and Beyond
*Historically-Documented Admissions
*NATO’s Secret Armies Terrorism Western
*Nobody Died at Sandy Hook Jim Fetzer
*Orlando False Flag: The Clash Histories
*Terror on the Tube: Behind the Veil 7/7
*We are Not Charlie Hebdo Freethinkers

Holocaust Reading List
*American Pravda Holocaust Denial Unz
*Debating Holocaust New Look at Both
*Did Six Million Really Die R Harwood
*Dissecting the Holocaust G Rudolf
*First Holocaust Origin Heddesheimer
*Hoax Twentieth Century Arthur Butz
*Holocaust Encyclopedia G Rudolf
*Holocaust Handbook Series G Rudolf
*Holocaust Hoax Exposed Victor Thorn
*Holocaust Industry Norman Finkelstein
*Holocaust Narrative E Michael Jones
*Holocaust Victims Accuse M Shonfeld
*IBM and the Holocaust by Edwin Black
*Ireland 1845-1850 Perfect Holocaust
*The Leuchter Reports: Critical Edition
*The Secret Holocaust Eustace Mullins
*Six Million Fact or Fiction Peter Winter
*Trotsky’s White Negroes Censored
*Unmasking Angel Death David Marwell

Military/Soldier/War Reading List
*Apocalypse 1945: Destruction Dresden
*Atomic Bomb Secrets David J Dionisi
*The Bad War Truth Never Taught
*The Best Enemy Money Can Buy
*Churchill, Hitler Unnecessary War
*Clash Civilizations Remaking World
*Conduct Unbecoming Gays Lesbians
*Day of Deceit Truth About FDR
*Devil's Game United States Helped
*Enough Already Time End War on
*Final Secret of Pearl Harbor Theobald
*Gruesome Harvest Costly Attempt
*Hitler's War by David Irving
*Jewish War Flavius Josephus
*Military Mind Control Story Trauma
*Military Necessity Homosexuality
*Neo-Conned Just War Principles
*Our Bodies Their Battlefields War
*Swords into Plowshares Ron Paul
*Vaccine A Covert Government
*War is a Racket by Smedley Butler
*The War on Terror The Plot to Rule
*What Soldiers Do Sex and the GI
*Where Men Win Glory J Krakauer

False Flag/Hoax/LIHOP Odysee
https://odysee.com/FALSE-FLAG-HOAX:c

False Flag/Hoax/LIHOP Rumble
https://rumble.com/playlists/VFsWzal-ErQ

False Flag/Hoax/LIHOP YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLx2BamAwbS6yAK6god9lTio8WwuVGIDyJ

Military/Soldier/War Odysee
https://odysee.com/MILITARY-SOLDIER-WAR:c

Military/Soldier/War Rumble
https://rumble.com/playlists/LVhGpHC7bSM

Military/Soldier/War YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLx2BamAwbS6x_a_QYOLaE1S9Nz9FixRXx

@irishsheis2629 (edited)
“To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize,”

God blessed David Irving with reasoning.

@dimik3855
When someone not only forbids you to question a past event but makes it illegal and threatens you with a costly lawsuit and imprisonment, you have to ask yourself what is being hidden.

@RoyilBlue-vp1ut
There's a strange similarity with this journalist and piers morgan, interrupting attacking the guest.
Whether right or wrong let the guest talk and let the viewer hear them, whether right or wrong. it's called respect

@barend4803
The blatent hostility of this reporter is remarkable.

@davidbaker8483
This interview was the last time the BBC dared to give Irving a hearing. He proved so popular and ignited so much interest they would never risk it now.

@kurtdaluege971
If the truth is self-evident why does it need to be protected by law?

@alanplumbridge9097
BBC hit job. Irving seems more convincing than the interviewer.

@leelyons86
This is the craziest rabbit hole I’ve ever gone down. What an incredible man.

@rukdropov
Irving was a darling of the Historian world until he took on the 2nd World War and uncovered some uncomfortable facts. History is written by the winners and truth is the first casualty of war. Well done David, we need brave people like you.

@garygranato9164
he was 20 years ahead of his time

@peterd.1165
David Irvine is one of the greatest historians of our time - His meticulous research reveals the truth ! He is a man of the greatest integrity fighting pure evil

@ioanonissimo
this is an infamous quote: "To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize." A quote by Voltaire.

@MoonHoax-md6mp
George Orwell: "Telling the truth during a period of universal deceit is a revolutionary act."

@angelahale11
This interview has aged like fine wine.

@user-uk9pe2bi1x
I as a black man rather respect an honest man like irving than a friendly racist behind my back

@LifeInStone
The honesty of the man in spite of being harassed by a biased interviewer is clear to anyone. Disgusting lack of journalism from BBC.

@garylynch9206
Ask a question give no more than eight seconds before interrupting

@bawsack69
A list of all the historical events it's illegal to question.
1- The Hulacaust.

06:47

Fake Skeptics & The Conspiracy Theorist Slur

more_vert

KLAUN check_circle

1 views 3 years ago

11:03

Caesar's Messiah Debunked

more_vert

KLAUN check_circle

1 views 3 years ago

,

Caesar's Messiah Debunked - Covert Messiah Refuted - Joe Atwill Critique

VerseByVerseBT

Oct 12, 2013
My Website:
http://caesarsmessiahdebunked.com

Caesar's Messiah was a book published by a dot com businessman named Joseph Atwill in 2005. Last year, he released a documentary based on the book and everyone is talking about it all of a sudden, because Atwill put out the world's most misleading press release for his film screening in London. Richard Dawkins then retweeted the press release, even though he said he didn't endorse the theory, and now this eight-year-old theory is news again. Thank you, Richard Dawkins.

The basic premise of Caesar's Messiah is that the Roman Imperial family, the Flavians, invented Jesus by using the Jewish historian Josephus and, presumably, other people to write the gospels after Rome defeated the Jews in 70 AD. The idea was to make the militant Jewish rebels accept a peaceful Messiah and, thereby, give Rome less trouble.

Atwill says that the New Testament was written in a code that requires you to read Josephus' War of the Jews alongside the New Testament to get the joke. He, of course, is the only person to crack this code, making him super smart.

The following are just some of the major problems with this theory. For footnotes and references to the claims I'm about to make, go to the link in the description or to the website ceasarsmessiahdebunked.com.

One of the biggest problems this theory has is the existence of Christianity before 73 AD, when Atwill says that the idea was concocted by the Romans. Quite simply, if Christianity can be demonstrated to exist before that time, this theory is toast.

The famous historian Tacitus says that Nero was persecuting Christians in Rome in 64 AD. He also mentions that "immense multitudes" of Christians were living in Rome at the time. Try to figure out why "immense multitudes" of Christians are in Rome ten years before Christianity was supposed to have been invented.

Suetonius also mentions Nero punishing Christians, as well as many Christian historians. That seems like a bad PR idea to write this kind of stuff: "Hey, everyone! Join the new religion so we can burn you alive and feed you to lions. The signup sheet is right over there."

Paul, who tradition has being killed by Nero around 66 AD, wrote thirteen of the letters in the New Testament, all of them very Christian. Even the most skeptical scholars in this field don't date these letters later than 68 AD, and most of them much earlier than that. You should find out why even these skeptical scholars feel the need to place these letters so early, which you can do at the website caesarsmessiahdebunked.com.

Okay, so, let's move beyond the historical problems with saying that Christianity didn't exist before 73 AD, and let's look at some of the common sense or logical problems with his theory.

Why in the world would the Romans do this? They had already totally crushed the Jews in 70 AD, destroying the city and the temple.

When the Romans had a problem with people not wanting to conform to their rules, which they did often, they did what they do best: crush people into submission with war. There was never any need to do anything different, especially at this point in their history. Also, consider that the Jews weren't even a threat to them in any meaningful way. Plus, as I said, they had already completely destroyed them.

Atwill, in response to J.P. Holding on the point that the Romans had already defeated the Jews, said well, yeah, but Josephus mentions that the Romans had some problems with a few Jewish rebels from Alexandria just after the war. Holding replied, saying:

What Josephus refers to is disturbances in Alexandria that were instigated by the Sicarii who had fled to Jerusalem after being beaten there. So, in reality, this was nothing more than a mop-up after a decisive victory -- and I might add, no reason for Titus to invent a religion for them, since he beat them soundly there as well.

Okay, so let's look a little bit at the New Testament that Titus supposedly created, and see if it makes sense to you that the Romans would make this up and actually want people to read it.

So, the Romans created a guy who said stuff like, "All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me?" Matthew 28:18