Quander

1:58:36

#0187 - Is THIS Anti Semitic? Study: Divorce Hurts Kids, Abortion Clinic of 50+ Years Closes - FED

more_vert

Further Every Day check_circle

44 views 1 month ago

00:59

Why Justice ⚖️Must Be Swift #fed

more_vert

Further Every Day check_circle

1 views 2 years ago

52:48

#068 Can a Christian Be Secular? Further. Every. Day. ft Deacon of But I Digress

more_vert

Further Every Day check_circle

1 views 2 years ago

,

First off, what does the Bible say about serving two masters? Wait, you may say, this has nothing to do with serving two masters! But it does, you cannot serve a secular humanist ideal and God at the same time. Secularism at its core IS Humanism. Now, to what the Bible has to say on this matter, Matthew 6:24: “No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon.”

Now, Secularism came out of the 1800s during the zenith of the enlightenment. For those who are fuzzy on what the enlightenment entailed, this name is given to the era that elevated the notion of Reason, either God’s or Man’s. The European Enlightenment focused on Man’s Reason, while the United States focused primarily on the notion of God’s Reason. In the 20th Century, the Christian Enlightenment sent men to the Moon, and missionaries and aid to the nations. The Secular Enlightenment sent Jews to the ovens and dissidents to the gulags. We also have the Secular Enlightenment to thank for “Critical Theory”, Utilitarianism (modern prisons), Marxism, Nazism, Facsism, Stalinism, and more.

Some Questions from each avenue of thought:

Theology: Was Jesus a Secularist? What does the Bible say about religion and politics? Well, first off, please note that the Sanhedrin was the political leadership of Christ’s time. While Christ did not start a Maccabean revolt, Christ also was not silent on the issues of the day. He regularly sparred with the Sadducee faction that was the majority seat holder in the Sanhedrin. Paul also played politics when he pitted the two parties against each other in Acts 23:6.

“But when Paul perceived that the one part were Sadducees, and the other Pharisees, he cried out in the council, Men and brethren, I am a Pharisee, the son of a Pharisee: of the hope and resurrection of the dead I am called in question.”

Christ spoke of overbearing taxes in Matthew 17:24-27 and in Matthew 22:20-22. In context, both of these have different meanings, but neither of them support the idea that Christ was some how a Secular Humanist who believed that the man made state was in a moral authority above God’s. Rather instead these verse support the doctrinal principle that Christ was answering each situation in a way that furthered the Gospel.
#christianity #abortion #roe #roevwade #rights #freedom #america #responsibility #fed #FurtherEveryDay #conservativemedia #theocracy

00:59

Undiscipled - Everyone Wants To Evangelize, But No One Wants To Disciple Further Every Day

more_vert

Further Every Day check_circle

1 views 2 years ago

01:13:48

#067 10 Good Guys With A Gun From FBI Mass Shooting Stats Pt 2 Further. Every. Day.

more_vert

Further Every Day check_circle

1 views 2 years ago

01:05:06

#052 Who Was Margret Sanger? How Did Eugenics Shape Her View Of Minorities? Further. Every. Day.

more_vert

Further Every Day check_circle

1 views 3 years ago

,Physical or Biological Determinism will always cause the sort of societal pain that comes from stripping man of his rights as an image bearer of God. If we view people as simply the flesh that they inhabit, we will rob them of what makes them special: God breathed life and a spirit into each one of us. This gives us a unique value. This realization of the infinite value should move us to view every human as priceless. The trouble with Secular Humanism that neither the value of God nor the value of man is recognized. Only the need for self actualization is acknowledged. So what would happen to a culture saddled with such a worldview if a certain minority were to be singled out as an obstacle to the majority’s self-actualization, whether through pseudoscience, religious innuendo, or avarice? We only need to look to recent history to see the results. In the 1700s a man named Thomas Robert Malthus produced the theory that the exponential population growth, combined with an arithmetic food supply growth, would produce immense human suffering in the inevitable overpopulation that would occur. The Malthusian Theory of Population, when combined with Darwinian Evolutionary Theory, bred an incredibly dangerous atmosphere where man thought it best to play God considering God’s absence from man’s worldview. This playing God took the form of Eugenics, or Good Birth (Eu-Greek for Good, Genes Greek for birth). Eugenics was rather popular during Margret Sanger’s day. It is important to remember that while she was a product of her times, those times are not that far behind us and neither are the propositions that motivated people like Margret Sanger. So now that we have partially set the stage, let’s not use some Pro-Life source. (Unfortunately, in the zeal for the Pro-Life cause, so many in the Pro-Life movement are not always accurate when representing Sanger. We should always build the strongest version of the opposition’s argument when forming a response. Dismantling steelmen, not strawmen, prepares us to engage our culture successfully.) Let us use scholars like Edwin Black (not a conservative), Planned Parenthood, and most importantly, Sanger herself to look at the founder of the contraceptive movement that has evolved into the abortion movement. https://youtu.be/HsrOPDdbTzM 18:45 Quotes on Sanger arguing for sexual freedom https://www.plannedparenthood.org/uploads/filer_public/cc/2e/cc2e84f2-126f-41a5-a24b-43e093c47b2c/210414-sanger-opposition-claims-p01.pdf https://sangerpapers.wordpress.com/tag/edwin-black/ NM Holocaust Video On Eugenics: https://youtu.be/jeSM9vz6ylg #podcast #podcasts